Keywords Change this


Project timeline

1967 – 1972



Location Change this

Prins Willem Alexanderlaan 651
7311 NB Apeldoorn

Current state


Architect Change this

Central Beheer Change this

Apeldoorn, Netherlands
by Hermann Hertzberger Change this
1 of 5

Description Change this

In the 1950s the supremacy of the Modernist model of the functional city had started to be criticised and certain designers looked to the patterns and human associations of the traditional city and archetypal forms of other cultures such as the North African Kasbah. The Dutch architect Herman Herzberger developed a kind of structuralist architecture influenced by the ethnic anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss. Herzberger’s Centraal Beheer insurance company project — built in Apeldoorn, Holland in 1974 — is a kind of ‘worker’s village’ designed so that the occupants ‘would have the feeling of being part of a working community without being lost in the crowd’. The building is a deep spatial matrix of concrete and blockwork arranged on a tartan grid. Platforms separated by light wells enable light to filter down into the centre of the plan. The unfinished quality of the materials and the repetitive nature of these small platforms allowed them to be appropriated by small groups of 8-10 people who were encouraged to personalise and decorate the space. The company actively encouraged a sense of the family to enter the office and many workers actually brought pieces of furniture and members of their family from home into work.

The collective ‘human scale’ language of the architecture however did not extend to providing large representative public spaces for the organisation and its labyrinthine quality meant that it was very easy to become lost inside the deep plan. The Centraal Beheer is most notable for its success in empowering the individual and reflected a general trend in Europe of a steadily increasing status for the office worker. Compared to previous examples the amount of space per person is very high as there is so much circulation; it is certainly much less efficient that any form of open plan. The driving force behind the building is the Company’s decision to place the human resource of their staff above questions of efficiency or economy.


Register to join to conversation.